nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:59:14 -0400
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net> wrote:
On 9/14/16 3:09 AM, Scott Weeks wrote:Yes, RPKI. That's what I was waiting for. Now we can get to a real discussionProblem is, RPKI does not work for people with legacy blocks who will not sign a Legacy RSA. ARIN doesn't own or have any say on how we use it, and we're
sure it does, move your registration to ripe. <http://www.iepg.org/2016-04-03-ietf95/160403.iepg-transfer.pdf> (this was also given at nanog or ripe or something, I couldn't remember which was the right one)
sure as heck not going to sign a legally binding contract saying they do :)
don't have to... see preso.
I'm a bit ambivalent about BGP hijacking as a DDOS mitigation strategy. Really there is no authority to say it's wrong. If your peers are cool with it, and their peers are cool with it who's to say it's wrong? -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net
Current thread:
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?, (continued)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Scott Weeks (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Scott Weeks (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 15)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 19)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 19)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Sean Rose (Sep 18)