nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:11:56 +0000
On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com<mailto:morrowc.lists () gmail com>> wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:05 AM, John Curran <jcurran () arin net<mailto:jcurran () arin net>> wrote: ... If you want to just use your legacy address block (wth the same services that where in place at ARIN's formation), then you don't need to enter into an LRSA - but please do still update your registration in the ARIN registry to have current contact data, as this helps deter potential hijackers. If you want to have those services that were developed since ARIN's formation, then I'd suggest reviewing the actual current LRSA agreement, as it is significantly improved over earlier versions. and probably: "If you think there are still improvements, show up at arin meetings and lobby for change" yes? Absolutely. /John
Current thread:
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?, (continued)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 16)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Jean-Francois Mezei (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryan Fields (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 19)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 19)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Christopher Morrow (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? John Curran (Sep 20)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Rich Kulawiec (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Sean Rose (Sep 18)