nanog mailing list archives

Re: Krebs on Security booted off Akamai network after DDoS attack proves pricey


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:09:46 +1000


In message <20160926155649.14061.qmail () ary lan>, "John Levine" writes:
That paper is about reflection attacks.  From what I've read, this was 
not a reflection attack.  The IoT devices are infected with botware 
which sends attack traffic directly.  Address spoofing is not particularly 
useful for controlling botnets.  

But that's not only remaining use of source address spoofing in direct 
attacks, no?  Even if reflection and amplification are not used, spoofing 
can still be used for obfuscation.

I agree that it would be nice if more networks did ingress filtering,
but if you're expecting a major decrease in evil, you will be
disappointed.

At this point it's mostly useful for identifying the guilty or
negligent parties afterwards.

R's,
John

Actually for ISP's that do it, it can becomes a source of intelligence
on where the compromised / misconfigured machines are.  A good ISP
would be informing their customers that they are seeing anomalous
traffic.

With IPv6 there is likely to be more of this traffic visible as
home NATs wont be masking it.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: