nanog mailing list archives
Re: IoT security
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 15:03:55 -0500
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 22:19:01 -0800, clinton mielke said:
Yup! All the mapping Ive done is over port 80. Id have a lot more than I currently have if I was looking at other ports, probably.
Wow. How does this work if more than one IoPT(*) device is in play in the home network, especially from different manufacturers? (*) Internet of Pwned Things.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: IoT security, (continued)
- Re: IoT security Richard (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Ed Lopez (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Damian Menscher (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Carl Byington (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security Marco Slater (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security bzs (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Michael Thomas (Feb 07)