nanog mailing list archives
Re: IoT security
From: Carl Byington <carl () five-ten-sg com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 18:03:16 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 08:30 -0800, Damian Menscher wrote:
So here's a modest proposal: log in as root and brick the device.
I strongly suspect that when the problem gets bad *enough*, someone will do exactly that. Yes, it is illegal in many places. Since when has the fact that any particular act is illegal been sufficient to deter *everyone*? People still drive while drunk. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREKAAYFAlibzdIACgkQL6j7milTFsH/WgCdEvde+zMvm8lRUyx2ay3EltZT 97kAn3Hl2tjPe2eUqiagDXxlE75OO/Xg =W+Cq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: IoT security, (continued)
- Re: IoT security Tom Beecher (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Randy Bush (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Richard (Feb 07)
- Re: IoT security Ed Lopez (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Damian Menscher (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security Carl Byington (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 08)
- Re: IoT security valdis . kletnieks (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security Marco Slater (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security clinton mielke (Feb 10)
- Re: IoT security Rich Kulawiec (Feb 09)
- Re: IoT security William Herrin (Feb 09)