nanog mailing list archives
Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:45:04 -0400
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:02:51 -0400, Lee Howard said:
Right. How many residential market gateways support any routing protocol at all?
Depends on how flabby a definition you use. Does "ask for a default route" count? :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC, (continued)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Nick Hilliard (Sep 22)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Lee Howard (Sep 22)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 22)
- RE: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Nicholas Warren (Sep 22)
- RE: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 22)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 22)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC valdis . kletnieks (Sep 22)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Lee Howard (Sep 26)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Blake Dunlap (Sep 26)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC valdis . kletnieks (Sep 27)
- Message not available
- RE: DHCPv6-PD -> Lack of route injection in RFC Steve Teusch (Sep 22)