nanog mailing list archives
Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge
From: Matt Harris <matt () netfire net>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 16:48:45 -0600
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:41 PM Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
Maybe this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Service_Fund https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service-fund https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service Kinda crappy they don't spell it out. Well, no, I guess USF would be closer to +-18%.
USF should not apply to IP transit connectivity wherein the connection between the transit provider and the customer does not cross state lines.
Current thread:
- GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Brandon Wade via NANOG (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Matt Harris (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Clayton Zekelman (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Eric Dugas (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Paul Stewart (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Clayton Zekelman (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Mike Hammett (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Matt Harris (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Clayton Zekelman (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge James R Cutler (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge bob evans (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Jason Hellenthal (Dec 03)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Matt Harris (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Matt Harris (Dec 02)
- Re: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge Mike Hammett (Dec 03)
- RE: GTT Regulatory Recovery Surcharge K MEKKAOUI (Dec 02)