nanog mailing list archives
RE: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018
From: Phil Lavin <phil.lavin () cloudcall com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:35:17 +0000
But this is a rather entirely different case. In this case, it seems that one very notable peering that -did- in fact exist, between AS205869 and AS6939, was not reported at all on the bgp.he.net page linked to above.
HE usually learn these hijacked routes from IX peering and route servers. bgp.he.net tends not to report on IX peering. To their credit, HE have an extremely open peering policy. To their detriment, this means their customers see the large majority of hijacked routes due to poor filtering on many IX route servers.
Current thread:
- AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 Ronald F. Guilmette (Jul 23)
- Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 sthaug (Jul 24)
- Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 Dovid Bender (Jul 24)
- RE: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 Phil Lavin (Jul 24)
- Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 sthaug (Jul 24)
- Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 Dovid Bender (Jul 24)
- Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 Ronald F. Guilmette (Jul 24)
- Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 Jason Alderfer (Jul 24)
- RE: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 Phil Lavin (Jul 25)
- Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 sthaug (Jul 24)
- Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 Jérôme Nicolle (Jul 25)
- Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018 Job Snijders (Jul 25)