nanog mailing list archives

Re: AS205869, AS57166: Featured Hijacker of the Month, July, 2018


From: Job Snijders <job () ntt net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:05:24 +0200

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 12:58:46PM +0200, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
From your initial list, I can still see some prefixes with the NLnog ring :

http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv4?q=206.41.128.0
http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_detail/lg01/ipv4?q=52.128.192.0
http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_bgpmap/lg01/ipv4?q=206.222.128.0

Also http://lg.ring.nlnog.net/prefix_bgpmap/lg01/ipv4?q=94.130.90.152

If I have to guess, those probably are ghost or stale routes. Wouldn't
worry about them.

I've noticed that quite a bunch of networks that use "BGP optimisers"
end up reporting having certain routes to the NLNOG LG while in reality
those were withdrawn globally.

Kind regards,

Job


Current thread: