nanog mailing list archives
Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
From: Shawn Ritchie <shawnritchie () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:57:48 -0500
I can second OSI, been using them for years for Juni and Cisco-compatible optics and they've been absolutely fine. On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:31 AM Andrey Khomyakov <khomyakov.andrey () gmail com> wrote:
We've been quite happy with https://www.osihardware.com The customer service is outstanding. --Andrey On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net> wrote:On 2018-05-29 13:48, Ryugo Kikuchi wrote:Does anyone have a recommended model of 3rd party's "QSFP-100G-LR4-S"forCisco ASR and Nexus? Cisco's original 100G SFP costs us an arm and a leg, so we want to trytouse 3rd party 100g SFP. But we are not sure which manufacturer's SFP is reliable or has good performance.FlexOptix (.net) are an excellent third-party provider for your first foray into non-vendor optics. Tom
-- Shawn
Current thread:
- 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Ryugo Kikuchi (Jun 05)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Mitcheltree, Harold B (Jun 05)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Phil Lavin (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Tom Hill (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Andrey Khomyakov (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Shawn Ritchie (Jun 06)
- RE: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Michel Py (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Andrey Khomyakov (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Eric Litvin (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Ryugo Kikuchi (Jun 11)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Alex S. (Jun 07)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Mitcheltree, Harold B (Jun 05)