nanog mailing list archives
Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
From: "Alex S." <4500811 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 20:21:45 -0400
Axiom Used variety of their sfps, twinax cables etc. Been rock solid On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 14:42 Ryugo Kikuchi <ringostarr0706 () gmail com> wrote:
Hey all, Does anyone have a recommended model of 3rd party's "QSFP-100G-LR4-S" for Cisco ASR and Nexus? Cisco's original 100G SFP costs us an arm and a leg, so we want to try to use 3rd party 100g SFP. But we are not sure which manufacturer's SFP is reliable or has good performance. Does anyone have experience? Many thanks, Roy
Current thread:
- 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Ryugo Kikuchi (Jun 05)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Mitcheltree, Harold B (Jun 05)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Phil Lavin (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Tom Hill (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Andrey Khomyakov (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Shawn Ritchie (Jun 06)
- RE: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Michel Py (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Andrey Khomyakov (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Eric Litvin (Jun 06)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Ryugo Kikuchi (Jun 11)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Alex S. (Jun 07)
- Re: 3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco Mitcheltree, Harold B (Jun 05)