nanog mailing list archives

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time


From: Olivier Benghozi <olivier.benghozi () wifirst fr>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 12:36:28 +0200

I wonder if this convergence time issue wouldn't be a typical mission for «BGP PIC Edge for MPLS Layer 3 VPNs».
But it would be necessary to migrate the DFZ to a VPN MPLS (and configure composite nexthop and BGP PIC / «Provider 
Edge Link Protection»).

Le 24 mai 2018 à 09:20, Vincent Bernat <bernat () luffy cx> a écrit :

This feature is already enabled on MX with MPC cards.

――――――― Original Message ―――――――
From: Adam Kajtar <akajtar () wadsworthcity org>
Sent: 23 mai 2018 23:21 -0400
Subject: Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time
To: Mark Tinka
Cc: nanog () nanog org

Hello again:

I've tried using the default route, adjusting bgp timers, and mutlipath.
Unfortunately, these changes haven't helped much. Juniper support hasn't
been very helpful also. Although, I think I might have found the solution.

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/forwarding-indirect-next-hop.html

Let me know what you think.

On Tue, May 22, 2018, 4:03 AM Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:



On 16/May/18 18:59, Phil Lavin wrote:

Ask if they will configure BFD for you. I’ve not found many transit
providers that will, but it’s worth a shot and it will lower failure
detection to circa 1 second.

We've tended to shy away from it, but we have 2 customers we've done it
for.


Current thread: