nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN RPKI TAL deployment issues


From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 02:55:45 +0000

On 25 Sep 2018, at 7:11 PM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:

Why is ARIN making it so hard for it’s members to get the benefits of the global ecosystem for their RIR controlled 
space?  What makes ARIN IP space so unique in this sense?  As part of a global ecosystem it’s incumbent of many of us 
to do the right thing here and ARIN is increasing the friction on the part of everyone to do the right thing.

Jared - 

Indeed - In the process of complying with a different legal environment, ARIN sometimes has to behave differently than 
RIRs that are located elsewhere...

In order to protect the stability of the services we provide to all ARIN customers, we have those relying on ARIN’s 
certificate services indemnify ARIN from claims of damages in connection with their usage.  Such indemnification isn’t 
unique to ARIN - RIPE has RPKI publishers indemnify RIPE, APNIC has any users of APNIC digital certificates indemnify 
APNIC, etc.   

The significant difference for ARIN is that we operate under a different legal regime, and as a matter of US law, it 
appears that we cannot rely only upon terms and conditions published in our website as evidence of informed agreement; 
i.e. within the US legal framework, we need a specific act of acceptance in order to have a binding agreement.  

We originally accomplished this binding via an explicit click-box acknowledgement and emailing the the TAL to agreeing 
party, then managed to evolve it over time to just the click-box acceptance of terms, and now are able to consider the 
act of simply downloading of the TAL itself as sufficient to constitute agreement to terms. 

Different legal regimes result in different implementations, even when the terms (such as indemnification) are similar. 

Thanks,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers




Current thread: