nanog mailing list archives
Re: MAP-E
From: Sander Steffann <sander () steffann nl>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 21:05:58 +0200
Hi Lee,
Also but, would that be a Net Neutrality problem, charging less for a service that has arguably worse access to Amazon, Reddit, Twitter, etc.?
Net neutrality as it is here in Europe usually is satisfied when no preferential treatment is given to a limited set of services (Netflix has higher priority than Amazon Prime etc). The European regulators don't seem to specify things in technical terms but in "Apps" and "Services". As long as you don't treat those unfairly you should be fine. When you tell a regulator "yes, the new standard works better than the old standard, and we encourage everybody to support that new standard (which is a recognised best practice)" then there shouldn't be any problem. Cheers :) Sander
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Current thread:
- Re: MAP-E, (continued)
- Re: MAP-E Vincent Bernat (Aug 08)
- Re: MAP-E Lee Howard (Aug 09)
- Re: MAP-E Sander Steffann (Aug 09)
- RE: MAP-E Masanobu Kawashima (Aug 09)
- Re: MAP-E Baldur Norddahl (Aug 02)
- Re: MAP-E JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: MAP-E Lee Howard (Aug 08)
- Re: MAP-E JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 08)
- Re: MAP-E Ca By (Aug 08)