nanog mailing list archives
Re: 5G roadblock: labor
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:12:00 -0500
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 5:50 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:
An interesting article on the road to 5G that they need to about double the size of the workforce to roll it out. I expect that this affects some of you directly.
Huh, you mean since you have to deploy a tower/unit every ~100 meters to get 5g to actually work at reasonable speeds (with nothing in the line of sight) you're going to need a bunch more people to put up these new things-ma-bobs? shocking news.
Current thread:
- 5G roadblock: labor Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Matt Hoppes (Dec 30)
- RE: 5G roadblock: labor jdambrosia (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Etienne-Victor Depasquale (Dec 31)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Shane Ronan (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Matthew Petach (Dec 30)
- Re: 5G roadblock: labor Mark Tinka (Dec 29)