nanog mailing list archives
Re: Last Mile Design
From: Sander Steffann <sander () steffann nl>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 19:22:08 +0100
Hi Mark,
My preference, for the home, would be Active-E. But I do understand the economics that may support PON, and my position on that has softened over the years.
Same for me. I like the architecture where the PON splitters are in powered roadside cabinets (even though the splitter is passive). That way the ISP can convert it to AE at any time they want. The architectures where PON has been hardcoded into the design has always felt like a huge risk regarding future developments. Cheers, Sander
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Current thread:
- Re: Last Mile Design, (continued)
- Re: Last Mile Design Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: Last Mile Design Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: Last Mile Design Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: Last Mile Design Mikael Abrahamsson (Feb 11)
- Re: Last Mile Design Mark Tinka (Feb 11)
- Re: Last Mile Design Fletcher Kittredge (Feb 13)
- Re: Last Mile Design Brandon Butterworth (Feb 10)
- Re: Last Mile Design [American Operators] Fletcher Kittredge (Feb 13)
- Re: Last Mile Design Mark Tinka (Feb 10)
- Re: Last Mile Design Mark Tinka (Feb 09)
- Re: Last Mile Design Sander Steffann (Feb 09)
- Re: Last Mile Design Clayton Zekelman (Feb 09)
- Re: Last Mile Design Grant Taylor via NANOG (Feb 09)
- Re: Last Mile Design Miles Fidelman (Feb 09)
- Re: Last Mile Design Grant Taylor via NANOG (Feb 09)
- Re: Last Mile Design Baldur Norddahl (Feb 09)
- Re: Last Mile Design Grant Taylor via NANOG (Feb 09)
- Re: Last Mile Design Miles Fidelman (Feb 09)
- Re: Last Mile Design Mark Tinka (Feb 09)
- RE: Last Mile Design Tony Wicks (Feb 09)