nanog mailing list archives
RE: 44/8
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:27:27 -0700
From:Michel Py <michel.py () tsisemi com> As an extension of RFC1918, it would have solved the questionable and nevertheless widespread squatting of 30/8 and other un-announced DoD blocks because 10/8 is not big enough for some folks. --- jerry () jtcloe net wrote: From: Jerry Cloe <jerry () jtcloe net> There's already widespread use (abuse ?) of DOD /8's. T-Mobile commonly assigns 26/8 space (and others) to customers and nat's it. -------------------------------------------------- I participated in cutting Verizon Hawaii's assets into a standalone network for Hawaiian Telcom in 2005. They used 113/8 all over the place. I worked at HT for 5 years after that, left for nine years and am now back and I am STILL dealing with that crap! scott