nanog mailing list archives
Re: 44/8
From: Michael Hayler <nanog-list-2009 () hayler de>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:39:22 +0200
On 19/07/18 11:02, Christopher Morrow wrote:
So.. this is/was a legacy allocation, right? with some 'not great' contact/etc info... the ARIN folk could have said: "Well.... sure! if the current folk who control access can positively show they do AND they don't mind parting with a /10... ok?" This ends up with a /10 of a /8 with better registration information and MAYBE better records keeping over time, right? that seems like a win to the ARIN community?
I see at least 2 /16 out of the mentioned /10 that are well documented in the HamnetDB. As far as I know, there is an ongoing renumbering "project" to get Services out of 44.224/16 and 44.225/16 here in DL, but from my perspective that is not finished yet. So that promisses some fun ... also, I do not see the Covering /8 Route anymore at our Internet Edge Routers. -- Best Regards Michael Hayler (DC1SHM)
Current thread:
- Re: 44/8, (continued)
- Re: 44/8 Tom Beecher (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 William Waites (Jul 18)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Corallo (Jul 18)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Harris (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Seth Mattinen (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jul 19)
- Re: 44/8 Ca By (Jul 22)