nanog mailing list archives
Re: 44/8
From: Nathan Brookfield <Nathan.Brookfield () simtronic com au>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:01:49 +0000
Yeah because v6 only is the answer plus tour assuming all of these clubs have routers and BGP and the money to get an allocation and ASN.... On 23 Jul 2019, at 22:59, Naslund, Steve <SNaslund () medline com> wrote: How about this? If you guys think your organization (club, group of friends, neighborhood association, whatever...) got screwed over by the ARDC, then why not apply for your own v6 allocation. You would then have complete control over its handling and never have to worry about it again. If you are not sure how to get started, visit ARINs website. It is not that difficult or expensive and it would not be hard to justify. Steven Naslund Chicago IL
And after 75 messages, nobody has asked the obvious question. When is ARDC going to acquire IPv6 resources on our behalf? Instead being all worried about legacy resources >we're highly underutilizing. Ham Radio is supposed to be about pushing the art forward. Let's do that. -KC8QAY
Current thread:
- Re: 44/8, (continued)
- Re: 44/8 Seth Mattinen (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 andrew.brant via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 William Herrin (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 William Herrin (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Fred Baker (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Paul Timmins (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Brandon Butterworth (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Hoppes (Jul 23)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 Nathan Brookfield (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Harris (Jul 23)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Brennan (Jul 24)
- Re: 44/8 Jimmy Hess (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 Owen DeLong (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 James Downs (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 Joe Hamelin (Jul 24)
- Ancient history (was Re: 44/8) David Conrad (Jul 24)
- Re: Ancient history (was Re: 44/8) William Herrin (Jul 24)
- RE: 44/8 Michel Py (Jul 22)