nanog mailing list archives
Re: QoS for Office365
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 20:59:06 +0200
On 8/Jul/19 20:50, Warren Kumari wrote:
Depends -- I'd note that the OP said "How can we mark the trafic while keeping the security..." -- some people use the COS / DSCP bits to annotate packets with security information, and use that to make *security decisions* instead of using it to prioritize traffic. Now, I'm not saying that this is why the OP is asking (or that I think it is a good idea, because, well, I don't think it is!), but it *is* a practice worth knowing about.
Assuming we are discussing such packets traversing the public Internet, a little tricky to expect IPP/DSCP values to remain intact in the life of an Internet packet. Mark.
Current thread:
- QoS for Office365 Joe Yabuki (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jared Mauch (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 cyrus ramirez via NANOG (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Robert Webb (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Warren Kumari (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Tom Beecher (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Joe Yabuki (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Ross Tajvar (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: QoS for Office365 Jared Mauch (Jul 08)