nanog mailing list archives

RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP


From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 10:16:03 -0600


Having an inbound:outbound ration of 10:1 is known as a leech ...

---
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Prasun Dey
Sent: Wednesday, 19 June, 2019 14:58
To: Aaron Gould
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP

Thank you Aaron,
This is great. This gives an interesting insight regarding CDN as
they seem to play a big role here. However, in general, what do you
call your ISP as? A 'Heavy Inbound' or 'Mostly Inbound'? Is there any
community standard about this ratio (having 1:10 or higher) to be
treated as Heavy Inbound? Or this is just a rough estimation?

Thank you.
-
Prasun

Regards,
Prasun Kanti Dey
Ph.D. Candidate,
Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
University of Central Florida
web: https://prasunkantidey.github.io/portfolio/







      On Jun 19, 2019, at 2:18 PM, Aaron Gould <aaron1 () gvtc com>
wrote:

      I run an eyeballs/isp network for about ~50,000 subscribers, and
I see about 1:10 ratio at peak time.  Last night ~4.5 gbps out, ~45
gbps in.  But, I do have local caching of 4 big name cdn cache
providers, so that might alter the 1:10 ratio I see on my actual inet
links (which do not include the local cdn traffic)

      …take Netflix for instance… I see on my local nfx cdn links,
1:100 ratio of in:out.  20 gbps inbound and .2 gbps outbound  (during
that same timeframe as aforementioned actual inet links)

      Numbers based on 21:00 CDT last night.


      -Aaron






Current thread: