nanog mailing list archives

Re: CloudFlare issues?


From: Justin Paine via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:04:10 -0700

FYI for the group -- we just published this:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-verizon-and-a-bgp-optimizer-knocked-large-parts-of-the-internet-offline-today/


_________________
*Justin Paine*
Director of Trust & Safety
PGP: BBAA 6BCE 3305 7FD6 6452 7115 57B6 0114 DE0B 314D
101 Townsend St., San Francisco, CA 94107



On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:25 PM Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:



On 24/Jun/19 18:09, Pavel Lunin wrote:


Hehe, I haven't seen this text before. Can't agree more.

Get your tie back on Job, nobody listened again.

More seriously, I see no difference between prefix hijacking and the
so called bgp optimisation based on completely fake announces on
behalf of other people.

If ever your upstream or any other party who your company pays money
to does this dirty thing, now it's just the right moment to go explain
them that you consider this dangerous for your business and are
looking for better partners among those who know how to run internet
without breaking it.

We struggled with a number of networks using these over eBGP sessions
they had with networks that shared their routing data with BGPmon. It
sent off all sorts of alarms, and troubleshooting it was hard when a
network thinks you are de-aggregating massively, and yet you know you
aren't.

Each case took nearly 3 weeks to figure out.

BGP optimizers are the bane of my existence.

Mark.



Current thread: