nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 11:11:57 +0900
John Levine wrote:
Automatic renumbering involving DNS was important design goal of IPv6 with reasons.News flash: nobody used the A6 RRTYPE which was intended to support IPv6 renumbering. In 2002, RFC 3363 made A6 experimental. In 2012, RFC 6563 made A6 historic. These days we all use AAAA, and we assign static addresses to our IPv6 servers.
FYI, A6 is totally useless for automatic renumbering. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Mark Andrews (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Mark Andrews (Oct 02)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment John Levine (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Mark Andrews (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Warren Kumari (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment tim () pelican org (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Harris (Oct 04)