nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 12:41:59 +0900
Doug Barton wrote:
Automatic renumbering involving DNS was important design goal of IPv6 with reasons. Lack of it is still a problem.
Meanwhile, the thing that most people miss about IPv6 is that except in edge cases, you never have to renumber. You get a massive address block that you can use as long as you pay your bill.
That is called "provider lock-in", which is the primary reason, when IPng WG was formed, why automatic renumbering is necessary for IPv6.
So, again, stop spreading FUD.
Look at the fact that IPv6 failed badly. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 02)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Message not available
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment John Levine (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Mark Andrews (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Warren Kumari (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Doug Barton (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment tim () pelican org (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Matt Harris (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Seth Mattinen (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Mark Andrews (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Seth Mattinen (Oct 03)