nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mx204 alternative
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 15:04:47 +0100
Baldur Norddahl wrote on 02/09/2019 13:52:
You can move a lot of traffic even with an old leftover server. Especially if you are not concerned with moving 64 bytes DDoS at line speed, because likely you would be down anyway in that case.
indeed, and there are very few problems that might happen in practice that couldn't be solved by something with kernel development experience.
Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Mx204 alternative, (continued)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Raymond Burkholder (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Olivier Benghozi (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Ćukasz Bromirski (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 03)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 03)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Nick Hilliard (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)