nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mx204 alternative
From: Olivier Benghozi <olivier.benghozi () wifirst fr>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 18:02:06 +0200
By the way they now say in this KB article that they implemented a «high performance mode» for MX204 / MX10003 with some «set chassis fpc slot high-performance-mode». Anyone wiling to test? :)
Le 2 sept. 2019 à 15:23, Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat () nuclearcat com> a écrit : From snabbco discussion, issue #1013, "If you read Intel datasheets then the minimum packet rate they are guaranteeing is 64B for 10G (82599), 128B for 40G (XL710), and 256B for 100G (FM10K)." But "hardware", ASIC enabled routers such as MX might be not better and even need some tuning. https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB33477&actp=METADATA "On summit MX204 and MX10003 platforms, the line rate frame size is 119 byte for 10/40GbE port and 95 byte for 100GbE port."
Current thread:
- Re: Mx204 alternative, (continued)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Baldur Norddahl (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Denys Fedoryshchenko (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Denys Fedoryshchenko (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Ross Tajvar (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Raymond Burkholder (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Olivier Benghozi (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Łukasz Bromirski (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 03)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 03)
- RE: Mx204 alternative adamv0025 (Sep 03)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Nick Hilliard (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)