Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets

[Warren Kumari <warren () kumari net>]

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 1:04 AM Alejandro Acosta
<alejandroacostaalamo () gmail com> wrote:
> Hello Lars,
>
>  As a comment there is a draft that proposes to deprecate AS_SET
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set/?include_text=1

Ta, thanks.
This completes the work started by RFC6472 - "Recommendation for Not
Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP".

W



> Alejandro,
>
>
> On 4/11/20 7:09 AM, Lars Prehn wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > how exactly do you aggregate routes? When do you add the AS_SET
> > attribute, when do you omit it? How does the latter interplay with RPKI?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Lars



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf