nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets
From: Lars Prehn <lprehn () mpi-inf mpg de>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 21:02:16 +0200
Thanks for all the answers! I think I have one more detail I'd like to know.
Lets say you own X/22. You have delegated X/23 to your customer, keeping the other /23 for yourself. For some reason, your customer also owns and announced (to you) all remaining IPs necessary to complete X/21.
Do you announce the aggregate X/21 (including addresses not associated with you), the aggregate X/22 (only address belonging to you), or the more specific route X/23 (including only addresses delegated from you to your customer)?
Best regards, Lars On 14.04.20 06:07, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Don't user as-sets step one. Rpki does not understand how to express an as-sets' authorization. Why do you want to do this?On Mon, Apr 13, 2020, 13:34 Lars Prehn <lprehn () mpi-inf mpg de <mailto:lprehn () mpi-inf mpg de>> wrote:Hi everyone, how exactly do you aggregate routes? When do you add the AS_SET attribute, when do you omit it? How does the latter interplay with RPKI? Best regards, Lars
Current thread:
- Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Lars Prehn (Apr 13)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Christopher Morrow (Apr 13)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Lars Prehn (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Christopher Morrow (Apr 14)
- RE: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Deepak Jain (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Lars Prehn (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Alejandro Acosta (Apr 13)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Warren Kumari (Apr 14)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Matthew Petach (Apr 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Matthew Petach (Apr 15)
- RE: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Matthew Petach (Apr 15)
- Re: Route aggregation w/o AS-Sets Christopher Morrow (Apr 13)