nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10g residential CPE
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 23:23:15 +0100
On Dec 25, 2020, at 9:16 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com> wrote:I Have an RB4011 and while it does work very well for the price it is not really practical for the sort of people who don't reside on this list.Which says what about 10Gbps-in-the-home practicality?
Mark is right, you’re wrong. 10G home service is great. Everybody I know here in Paris has it. There’s just no particularly reason to drop down to 1G, for the EUR 10/month difference. -Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Current thread:
- 10g residential CPE Ben Cannon (Dec 24)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Steven Karp (Dec 24)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Brandon Martin (Dec 24)
- RE: 10g residential CPE Tony Wicks (Dec 24)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- RE: 10g residential CPE Tony Wicks (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Bill Woodcock (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE bzs (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mel Beckman (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- RE: 10g residential CPE Tony Wicks (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Brandon Martin (Dec 24)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Steven Karp (Dec 24)