nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10g residential CPE
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:06:28 -0800
On 12/26/20 10:00 AM, Tony Wicks wrote:
Actually the equipment vendor's build in this sort of situation is normally directly related to the availability of affordable chipsets from the likes of Broadcom. For example the chipset in my XGSPON router is a BCM6858. No vendor is going to spend money to produce a CPE that no one will buy. Once the likes of Broadcom produce an affordable solution then all the main vendors will roll out CPE in short order.
Do they have no control of the linux kernel? This is purely OS kernel work and has nothing to do with underlying hardware.
Mike
Current thread:
- Re: 10g residential CPE, (continued)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Bill Woodcock (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE bzs (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 25)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mel Beckman (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- RE: 10g residential CPE Tony Wicks (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Valdis Klētnieks (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Michael Thomas (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Darin Steffl (Dec 26)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Aaron Wendel (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Mark Tinka (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Seth Mattinen (Dec 28)
- Re: 10g residential CPE Baldur Norddahl (Dec 28)