nanog mailing list archives
Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:54:28 -0800
On Feb 18, 2020, at 4:00 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote: I am not a fan of quic or any udp traffic. My suggestion was that Google use an new L4 instead of UDP, but that was too hard for the Googlers.
The argument I have heard is that residential firewalls often block anything that is *not* UDP or TCP. The question for the googlers was existential - can it work at all?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Current thread:
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential, (continued)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Masataka Ohta (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Tom Beecher (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Jared Mauch (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Jared Mauch (Feb 20)
- Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Hunter Fuller (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Brian J. Murrell (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Mike Hammett (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Brandon Martin (Feb 19)