nanog mailing list archives
Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential
From: Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 15:16:03 -0600
If by targeting DDoSes you mean rate limiting all UDP (because some UDP is bad), then I would expect that policy to be published on a provider's website so that folks using UDP would at least have the option to research and know this info before signing up or agreeing to a service commitment. Similarly, application developers could point to a provider's policy when designing their applications or assisting users. Even if Net Neutrality is dead, I believe the "Restoring Internet Freedom" order is still a thing in the US.
On 2/19/2020 3:03 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Net Neutrality likely wouldn't have impacted this at all. AT&T isn't targeting QUIC, they're targeting DDoSes.----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From: *"Brian J. Murrell" <brian () interlinx bc ca> *To: *nanog () nanog org *Sent: *Wednesday, February 19, 2020 3:01:20 PM *Subject: *Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 13:54 -0600, Blake Hudson wrote: > > Isn't this exactly why Net Neutrality is a thing: Isn't it a "dead" thing in the USofA? > So that people (or > companies) are free to develop new applications or enhance existing > ones > without running into a quagmire of different policies implemented by > any > number of different networks between the application developer and > the > application's users? Yes, this is a very prominent reason for Net Neutrality. Too bad the FCC killed that out from under the people and companies that would utilize it to develop new applications. Cheers, b.
Current thread:
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential, (continued)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Lukas Tribus (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Masataka Ohta (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Tom Beecher (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Jared Mauch (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Jared Mauch (Feb 20)
- Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Hunter Fuller (Feb 20)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Brian J. Murrell (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Mike Hammett (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Blake Hudson (Feb 19)
- Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT&T residential Brandon Martin (Feb 19)