nanog mailing list archives
Re: interesting troubleshooting
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:11:42 -0700
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:07 PM Job Snijders <job () ntt net> wrote:
Do we know which specific VPN technologies specifically are harder to hash in a meaningful way for load balanacing purposes, than others?
I would expect it to be true of any site to site VPN data flow. The whole idea is for the guy in the middle to be unable to deduce anything about the flow. If the technology provides hints about which packets match the same subflow, it isn't doing a very good job. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- interesting troubleshooting Nimrod Levy (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Job Snijders (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Job Snijders (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Christopher Morrow (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Brandon Martin (Mar 24)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting William Herrin (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Job Snijders (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Chris Adams (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Steve Meuse (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)