nanog mailing list archives
Re: interesting troubleshooting
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:41:06 +0200
On 21/Mar/20 18:25, Saku Ytti wrote:
Yeah we run it in a multivendor network (JNPR, CSCO, NOK), works. I would also recommend people exclusively using CW+FAT and disabling LSR payload heuristics (JNPR default, but by default won't do with CW, can do with CW too).
We weren't as successful (MX480 ingress/egress devices transiting a CRS core). In the end, we updated our policy to avoid running LAG's in the backbone, and going ECMP instead. Even with l2vpn payloads, that spreads a lot more evenly. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: interesting troubleshooting, (continued)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting William Herrin (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Matthew Petach (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Chris Adams (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Steve Meuse (Mar 20)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Mark Tinka (Mar 22)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- RE: interesting troubleshooting adamv0025 (Mar 23)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Mar 21)
- Re: interesting troubleshooting Saku Ytti (Mar 22)