Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

[Neil Hanlon <neil () shrug pw>]

Respectfully:

How can something be deployed if it doesn't even exist?

I think we'd all be better off focusing on deploying real things with real implementations--you know, like IPv6... And 
not debating the merits of a protocol that doesn't exist except in.. Umm.. "theory".

And I'll save you some research. I'm not part of some ipv6 spamhaus illuminati group. Kinda wish I was--I've always 
wanted to be part of an exclusive club.

-Neil

On May 13, 2020, 17:31, at 17:31, Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io> wrote:
> LOL so much heat and lies from IPv6 fans that don't want IPv4+ to be
> deployed.
> ________________________________
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of David Hubbard
> <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:10 AM
> To: nanog () nanog org <nanog () nanog org>
> Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
>
>
> I suspect he’d want to slow adoption and push his frankestein IPv4
> because any extension of IPv4 use makes the netblocks’s he’s obtained
> questionable ‘ownership’ of more valuable, in theory.
>
>
>
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+dhubbard=dino.hostasaurus.com () nanog org> on
> behalf of Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 5:02 PM
> To: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org>
> Subject: Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
>
>
>
> Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:
>
>
>
> https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/02/at-21-tbps-reaching-new-levels-of-ipv6-traffic.html
>
>
>
> Some internet service providers may have more than half of their
> traffic as IPv6.
>
>
>
> Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:
>
>
>
> https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
>
>
>
> Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to
> abandon the work already done?