Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election

[Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>]

Akamai already has 15% peak IPv6 traffic:

https://blogs.akamai.com/2020/02/at-21-tbps-reaching-new-levels-of-ipv6-traffic.html

Some internet service providers may have more than half of their traffic as
IPv6.

Some countries are now crossing more than 50% IPv6 availability:

https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html

Why do you think you can overtake the IPv6 train? Why would we want to
abandon the work already done?

ons. 13. maj 2020 20.27 skrev Elad Cohen <elad () netstyle io>:

> We will take your path, lets wait 20 years for IPv6 to be fully deployed.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Brielle <
> bruns () 2mbit com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:16 PM
> *To:* NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>
> *Subject:* Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election
>
> On 5/13/2020 12:09 PM, Elad Cohen wrote:
> > -----
> > /There's a fundamental lack of understanding from people on why you can't
> > just 'bolt on' more addresses to IPv4.  Data structures in memory,
> > software APIs and syscalls, hex notations, subnetting, route
> > determination and propigation with internet routing protocols like BGP,
> > hardware CAM, among many other things./
> > -----
> > All of it will be resolved with a software update, and BGP will be
> > updated to support IPv4+ with backward compatibility.
>
>
> You mean what everyone's already implemented with IPv6?  A complete
> overhaul/replacement for IPv4, with all the changes already done and
> fully supported in most major software packages, servers, routers, and
> switches?
>
> Enlighten me on why you are so obsessed with re-implementing IPv6 as IPv4+?
>
>
> -
> > /I'm not here to do your homework. Its not my fault you lack the
> > understanding as to why people are openly mocking you here on your
> > 'inventions'./
> > -----
> > Nobody is "mocking" besides IPv6 fans that are against any solution
> > until IPv6 will be fully deployed which can take more 20 years from now.
>
>
> Yes, because the all powerful IPv6 cartel is working with the Lumber
> Cartel to stifle your 'inventions' for 'solving' the world's IP and spam
> problems.
>
>
> --
> Brielle Bruns
> The Summit Open Source Development Group
> http://www.sosdg.org    /     http://www.ahbl.org