nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:26:05 -0400
On 26 Apr 2021, at 9:59 AM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
... The fact that certain parties decided on their own that space not present in the global routing table was 'fair game' or 'private' doesn't make them correct, it simply makes them ill informed. My reading of this thread is that the space is now permanently bogon’d for some honeypot. so yeah, it is fair game. Enjoy the public goods all !
<chuckle> While each network operator is free to make their own decisions on how they configure their routers, I’d personally suggest that folks think twice before considering another parties IP address blocks to be available for private use. Just as no one expected to ever see many of these networks be publicly announced, it would not surprise me in the least to see production applications on these blocks at some point in the near future… /John
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Carlos M. Martinez (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Christopher Morrow (Apr 27)
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Apr 27)
- Message not available
- Re: DoD IP Space Randy Bush (Apr 27)
- RE: DoD IP Space Ryan Hamel (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tom Beecher (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Ca By (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 26)
- RE: DoD IP Space Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Apr 26)
- RE: DoD IP Space Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space John Curran (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Michael Thomas (Apr 26)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mel Beckman (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Bill Woodcock (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Christian de Larrinaga via NANOG (Apr 25)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Apr 25)