nanog mailing list archives
Re: .bv ccTLD
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 19:46:32 -0500
In general I could I understand that, but it is my understanding that the domain is still marked reserved at the Secretariat, which is to say they could not have assigned any domains in it yet, even if they were inclined to which we are told they are not. In short, I think this is a possibility not an impossibility or I wouldn't have asked. -- jra On December 3, 2021 6:24:22 PM EST, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:
On Dec 3, 2021, at 2:45 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:So, what's the actual status of .bv? Assigned, or reserved?Assigned: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:code:3166:BV <https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:code:3166:BV>Anyone here got a buddy on the secretariat? :-)Even if they did, transitioning codes is a long (99 year? I’ve forgotten) process… Regards, -drc
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Current thread:
- .bv ccTLD Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD David Conrad (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay Ashworth (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD David Conrad (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jaap Akkerhuis (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Cynthia Revström via NANOG (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay Ashworth (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Stephane Bortzmeyer (Dec 05)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Owen DeLong via NANOG (Dec 06)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay Hennigan (Dec 06)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay Ashworth (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD David Conrad (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Carsten Bormann (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Cynthia Revström via NANOG (Dec 04)