nanog mailing list archives
Re: .bv ccTLD
From: Cynthia Revström via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 21:28:32 +0100
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 5:03 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo () tzi org> wrote:
On 2021-12-04, at 16:18, Cynthia Revström via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:I think pretty much all codes ending in an X is because there were no better ones available. (I am not certain on this part though)I don’t think the Mexicans would agree :-)
Oh oops, not sure how I forgot about that one, I just thought about ax, cx, and sx.
.bx (Benelux) is reserved only, but it is another counter-example.
I am really nitpicking here but I believe BX is one of the cases of not being a ccTLD but just ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code for some other reason (seemingly for trademark/IP reasons in this case). -Cynthia
Current thread:
- Re: .bv ccTLD, (continued)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay Ashworth (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD David Conrad (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jaap Akkerhuis (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Cynthia Revström via NANOG (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay Ashworth (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Stephane Bortzmeyer (Dec 05)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Owen DeLong via NANOG (Dec 06)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay Hennigan (Dec 06)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay Ashworth (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Carsten Bormann (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Cynthia Revström via NANOG (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jaap Akkerhuis (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD John Levine (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 03)
- Re: .bv ccTLD John Levine (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jaap Akkerhuis (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Nick Hilliard (Dec 04)
- Re: .bv ccTLD Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 05)