nanog mailing list archives

Re: Log4j mitigation


From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 12:11:37 +0000

Andy Ringsmuth wrote on 11/12/2021 03:54:
The intricacies of Java are over my head, but I’ve been reading about this Log4j issue that sounds pretty bad.

What do we know about this? What, if anything, can a network operator do to help mitigate this? Or even an end user?

The payload can be contained in https, so there is no way of detecting / stopping this at the network level. Installations need to be upgraded / fixed.

https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html

1. upgrade log4j to 2.15.0 and restart all java apps
2. start java with "-D log4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true" (v2.10+ only)
3. start java with "LOG4J_FORMAT_MSG_NO_LOOKUPS=true" environment variable (v2.10+ only) 4. zip -q -d log4j-core-*.jar org/apache/logging/log4j/core/lookup/JndiLookup.class

There's a lot of scanning going on at the moment, so if you have an exposed java instance running something which includes log4j2, you may already be compromised.

Nick


Current thread: