nanog mailing list archives
Re: Log4j mitigation
From: "Jörg Kost" <jk () ip-clear de>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:24:50 +0100
On 13 Dec 2021, at 12:11, Jean St-Laurent wrote:
You are right, but it's still a good place to start looking.
It is not. It will give you false assumptions.
What do you recommend? Panic?
Yes. Out in public for four days, you better should assume breach by now.
Current thread:
- Re: Log4j mitigation, (continued)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jared Mauch (Dec 11)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Owen DeLong via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jared Mauch (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Carsten Bormann (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Alain Hebert (Dec 13)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Owen DeLong via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jared Mauch (Dec 11)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Saku Ytti (Dec 13)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Saku Ytti (Dec 13)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- RE: Log4j mitigation Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Jörg Kost (Dec 13)
- Re: Log4j mitigation Joe Greco (Dec 13)