nanog mailing list archives
Re: Parler
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:39:54 +0100
On Jan 10, 2021, at 4:03 PM, sronan () ronan-online com wrote: Another interesting angle here is that it as ruled President couldn’t block people, because his Tweets were government communication.
Right, the _government_ can’t discriminate in which of its citizens it communicates with, and which it listens to.
So has Twitter now blocked government communication?
Sure. No problem with that. An unregulated, non-monopoly, private party isn’t required to provide a forum for anyone, government or individual. -Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Current thread:
- Re: Parler, (continued)
- Re: Parler Bill Woodcock (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Izaac (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Valdis Klētnieks (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler cosmo (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Rod Beck (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Joe Greco (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Matt Hoppes (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Haudy Kazemi via NANOG (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler mark seery (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Ben Cannon (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Bill Woodcock (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Matthew Petach (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Bryan Fields (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Matthew Petach (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Michael Thomas (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Mel Beckman (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Matthew Petach (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler Mel Beckman (Jan 10)
- Re: Parler bzs (Jan 10)