nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re Parler
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 14 Jan 2021 16:47:19 -0500
In article <700000E9-8BE1-483C-8E49-E9CDA6B4AF9C () beckman org> you write:
Parler also has an excellent antitrust case, as the idea that three companies would simultaneously pull the plug on their services for a single common customer is going to be hard to explain to a judge.
Aw, come on. Judges have even beeen known to read the papers or turn on the TV now and then. R's, John
Current thread:
- RE: Re Parler, (continued)
- RE: Re Parler adamv0025 (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Mel Beckman (Jan 14)
- RE: Re Parler Keith Medcalf (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Alain Hebert (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Rod Beck (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Ge DUPIN (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Rich Kulawiec (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler and its very underprepared attorney Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Jan 14)
- RE: Re Parler adamv0025 (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler William Herrin (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler John Levine (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Mel Beckman (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Mike Bolitho (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler John Sage (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Masataka Ohta (Jan 14)