nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re Parler
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 22:05:20 +0000
John, What’s your point? Are you saying that it’s OK for an ISP to break antitrust laws for a political cause? To bring this discussion back into the realm of operational discussions, shouldn’t we be building infrastructure that has the audit and change management components needed to detect ill-advised actions like Amazon’s? I recently read that Theranos IT conveniently “lost the keys” to the encrypted database files that are key evidence in the DOJ’s fraud case against them. Clearly there is an ethical case for us as technologists to treat these events in a non-partisan way. The days of “I was just following orders” are long gone. -mel
On Jan 14, 2021, at 1:47 PM, John Levine <johnl () iecc com> wrote: In article <700000E9-8BE1-483C-8E49-E9CDA6B4AF9C () beckman org> you write:Parler also has an excellent antitrust case, as the idea that three companies would simultaneously pull the plug on their services for a single common customer is going to be hard to explain to a judge.Aw, come on. Judges have even beeen known to read the papers or turn on the TV now and then. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Re Parler, (continued)
- Re: Re Parler Mel Beckman (Jan 14)
- RE: Re Parler Keith Medcalf (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Alain Hebert (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Rod Beck (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Ge DUPIN (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Rich Kulawiec (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler and its very underprepared attorney Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Jan 14)
- RE: Re Parler adamv0025 (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler William Herrin (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler John Levine (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Mel Beckman (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Jay R. Ashworth (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Mike Bolitho (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler John Sage (Jan 14)
- Re: Re Parler Masataka Ohta (Jan 14)