Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

[Randy Bush <randy () psg com>]

i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
it being the de facto global anything-ops list.  perhaps we do not
need to fix that.

randy

---
randy () psg com
`gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy () psg com`
signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery