nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and CDN's
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 16:04:57 +0200
On 11/27/21 02:41, Michael Thomas wrote:
Amazon's in this case. They are monetizing their lack of v6 support requiring you go through all kinds of expensive hoops instead of doing the obvious and routing v6 packets.
Individual CDN's and content providers have better control over how they deploy IPv6, vs. ISP's who have far less capital, warm bodies and innovation DNA.
I'm arguing for the latter. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 26)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Scott Morizot (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Gary Buhrmaster (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Oliver O'Boyle (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Mark Tinka (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's JCLB (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's William Herrin (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Michael Thomas (Nov 27)
- Re: IPv6 and CDN's Dave Taht (Nov 28)
- RE: IPv6 and CDN's Jean St-Laurent via NANOG (Nov 26)