nanog mailing list archives
Re: IRR for IX peers
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 15:08:17 +0100
Randy Bush wrote on 04/10/2021 21:15:
i was hoping that, if 3130 said it is peering with martha, artemis would get a clue and stfu
right. This was klunked around using the export-via and import-via rpsl constructions (draft-snijders-rpsl-via), which never quite made it to ietf wg adoption status. It did, however, point out how limited RPSL grammar was :(
Nick
Current thread:
- IRR for IX peers Randy Bush (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Nick Hilliard (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Randy Bush (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Nick Hilliard (Oct 07)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Randy Bush (Oct 07)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Nick Hilliard (Oct 07)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Mark Tinka (Oct 07)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Randy Bush (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Nick Hilliard (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Ćukasz Bromirski (Oct 05)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Mark Tinka (Oct 05)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Randy Bush (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Ben Maddison via NANOG (Oct 04)