nanog mailing list archives
IRR for IX peers
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 09:44:27 -0700
so i have an AS (3130) which peers at the SIX (RSs and some direct). in the hope that leak detectors such as artemis would stop false positives when they see my prefixes announced customer cones of SIX peers, i want to add the SIX peers to my aut-num: policy. export: to AS-SEATTLEIX-RS-CLIENTS announce AS-RG-SEA seems clear and obvious. but import: from AS-SEATTLEIX-RS-CLIENTS accept AS-SEATTLEIX-RS-CLIENTS would seem to allow bill's bait and sushi to announce microsoft to me. and i am not sure that expansive `from` clause is actually allowed. what are others in this space doing? [ and let's not descend into the rat-hole of dissing the IRR. i have heard of this RPKI thing and might try it some day. ] randy --- randy () psg com `gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy () psg com` signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery
Current thread:
- IRR for IX peers Randy Bush (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Nick Hilliard (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Randy Bush (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Nick Hilliard (Oct 07)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Randy Bush (Oct 07)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Nick Hilliard (Oct 07)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Mark Tinka (Oct 07)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Randy Bush (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Nick Hilliard (Oct 04)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Ćukasz Bromirski (Oct 05)
- Re: IRR for IX peers Mark Tinka (Oct 05)