nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network visibility
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:55:20 +0000
On Oct 21, 2021, at 8:19 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com<mailto:owen () delong com>> wrote: No, but you are ignoring the point of my message… The TCP/IP internet existed _BEFORE_ the flag day you mentioned. The flag day was the end of NCP, not the beginning of TCP/IP. IIRC, at the time, Owen, But we’re not talking about the birth of TCP/IP. We’re talking about the birth of the capital-I Internet, which by definition runs exclusively on TCP/IP, and that didn’t start until Jan 1, 1983. Although there was experimentation using IP during 1982, that was still ARPANET. It was the guaranteed exclusive availability of IP that made 1983 the Internet’s birth date. And no, it’s not analogous to the eventual IPv6 transition, because both IPv5 and IPv4 are Capital-I Internet standard protocols. -mel it was IP version 2, but IP versions 2, 3, and 4 came in relatively rapid succession of each other and 4 was the first version with (relatively) clean layer separation between 2, 3, and 4. According to https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2016/09/final-report-on-tcpip-migration-in-1983/ , TCP/IP was developed starting in 1975 and declared the official future standard of the ARPANET in March, 1982, with a transition plan supporting both protocols (NCP and TCP/IP) until January 1, 1983. January 1, 1983 is more analogous to the future happy day we finally turn off IPv4 at the majority of peering points and PNIs than it is to the past days when IPv6 began being deployed. True, the initial deployment of TCP/IP and the flag day were much closer together for the implementation of IPv4 and deprecation of NCP than has been the case for IPv6 deployment and IPv4 deprecation, but nonetheless, it is still true that there were at least several months of TCP/IP deployment, testing, and use at multiple sites and on multiple systems prior to the deprecation of NCP on January 1, 1983.
Current thread:
- RE: Network visibility, (continued)
- RE: Network visibility Kain, Becki (.) (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Gerry Boudreaux (Oct 21)
- RE: Network visibility bzs (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Miles Fidelman (Oct 21)
- RE: Network visibility bzs (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Jay Hennigan (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Miles Fidelman (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Owen DeLong via NANOG (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Miles Fidelman (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 22)
- Re: Network visibility Miles Fidelman (Oct 22)
- Re: Network visibility bzs (Oct 21)
- Re: Network visibility Michael Thomas (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Mel Beckman (Oct 20)
- Re: Network visibility Miles Fidelman (Oct 20)