nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 19:04:30 -0700
Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...
On Sep 8, 2021, at 1:31 AM, Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote: If the mid size eyeballs knew ipv4 is going away in 10, 15, 20 years whichever it is, then they'd of course have to start moving too, because no upstream.
And they would fight it tooth and nail, just like they do now, and if they found an address they could NAT to, they would argue that that one address gave them the ability to avoid the transition -just like they do now.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Andy Smith (Sep 25)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Chris Adams (Sep 25)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Masataka Ohta (Sep 26)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jim Young via NANOG (Sep 26)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Nick Hilliard (Sep 26)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Denys Fedoryshchenko (Sep 22)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Tim Howe (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Tim Howe (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Fred Baker (Sep 11)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Johnson (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 12)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 13)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Nick Hilliard (Sep 13)